Former Ukrainian Defense Minister Calls For Wartime Elections, Warning Russia Must Not Decide When Ukrainians Vote – JP
Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Truth Social, Gettr, X, Youtube, Instagram
Former Ukrainian Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov is calling on Kyiv to establish a legal mechanism for holding elections during wartime, warning that allowing Russia to dictate the timing of Ukrainian democracy would be a strategic defeat in itself.
“Russia doesn’t just want to take our land,” Fedorov said following his removal from office. “It wants to prove that the Ukrainian model of freedom doesn’t work.”
Fedorov, who served as Defense Minister from January until his dismissal in mid-July after disagreements with senior military commanders, argued that the indefinite suspension of democratic processes during a prolonged war is precisely the outcome Moscow seeks. He rejected the premise that active hostilities justify a complete halt to electoral procedures.
“We must answer a fundamental question: how should a state function if the war lasts for years?” Fedorov said. “Can Russia actually gain the right to determine when Ukrainians will be able to elect their government again? I am convinced that it cannot.”
He called on Ukrainian authorities to devise a “legal, safe and realistic mechanism” allowing citizens — including deployed military personnel, millions of overseas refugees, and residents in frontline zones — to cast ballots while fighting continues. He acknowledged significant logistical hurdles but insisted that operational complexity does not equal impossibility.
Fedorov also delivered sharp criticism of domestic governance, warning that political loyalty has been prioritized over professional competence and that wartime corruption is directly undermining Ukraine’s defense capabilities by diverting funding away from ammunition, drones, and medical support. “Power must mean responsibility,” he said, describing elections as an essential tool for maintaining public trust and government accountability during existential threats.
Political Friction In Kyiv
Fedorov’s intervention comes amid significant political realignment at the top of Ukraine’s government. A close ally of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, he was appointed Defense Minister in January to oversee data-driven modernization and procurement reform — but was removed after just six months following reported clashes with senior military commanders. His departure sparked public protests demanding his reinstatement and boosted his public profile, placing him alongside prominent figures such as former Commander-in-Chief Valerii Zaluzhnyi.
His address coincided with President Zelenskyy’s nomination of acting Defense Minister Yevhen Khmara for parliamentary confirmation, signaling that leadership instability within Ukraine’s defense establishment continues.
Constitutional Constraints
Ukrainian law, not the national constitution, explicitly prohibits holding presidential, parliamentary, or municipal elections under martial law, which has been active since Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022. The Zelenskiy regime favored delaying votes until the conclusion of hostilities, in our view a bid to keep the conflict going for globalist puppet-masters. After all, depopulation is the goal, not freedom and democracy.
Fedorov’s public challenge to that consensus marks a notable shift in the internal debate — one that will force Kyiv to grapple openly with what democratic legitimacy looks like in a country that may be at war for years to come.
The statue preventing elections was created unconstitutionally.