Elon Said Money Will Die By 2036. The Fed Is Betting On It

Exclusive Interviews, Videos

Elon Said Money Will Die By 2036. The Fed Is Betting On It

/script type=”text/javascript” data-src=”https://app.getresponse.com/view_webform_v2.js?u=S6bT5&webforms_id=A25R”>

Summary

The host argues Elon Musk is half-right that “money won’t matter by 2036”: AI and robots genuinely collapse the price of anything machines can make (computers down 93% since 2000, video/audio down 67% since 2009), but that deflation never lands in your cost of living because life’s big expenses — tuition, childcare, medical care, services, up 125% since 2000 — are bottlenecked on land, licensing, and power, things a smarter model can’t fix. He replays the 1996 precedent: Greenspan, facing productivity data later revised from 0.4% to sharply higher, held rates at 5.25% rather than tighten into the boom, and the resulting gains skipped consumer prices entirely and flowed to asset owners as the S&P tripled — and today’s regime has even less choice, because net interest ($970B) now exceeds Department of War spending ($916B), Social Security’s worker-per-beneficiary ratio is falling from 2.7 toward 2.3 with the OASI trust fund projected to run dry in Q4 2032 (four years before Musk’s 2036), and the AI buildout itself demands $1.3-1.4 trillion in utility capex. His conclusion: in a world of infinite machine abundance plus infinite money creation, value accrues to what can’t be printed — rank assets by how easily more can be created (fiat unlimited, equities dilutable, gold ~1.7% annual supply growth, land fixed, Bitcoin absolutely fixed) and own the scarce side, since even Musk’s own equity “abundance” saw $750 billion of paper wealth evaporate in six weeks.

Top 5 Key Topics

• Musk’s claim and its real mechanism: Asked how his companies make money, Musk answered that money won’t matter by 2036 because robots and AI will produce more goods and services than anyone can consume — yet in the same interview he admitted the binding constraint is power and cooling, physical things that can’t be printed, which is exactly where scarcity value will accrue.
• The 1996 Greenspan template: Published productivity data showed growth collapsing from 3.4% to 0.4% while revised data later showed it rising; Greenspan argued the statistics were wrong, the FOMC held rates 11-1 on September 24, 1996, and the boom’s gains showed up in a 3.2x S&P run rather than falling consumer prices — productivity absorbed into asset bubbles pays whoever already owns assets.
• Three obligations that remove today’s Fed’s choice: Net interest on the debt now exceeds the entire Department of War budget ($970B vs. $916B, with the gross-interest crossing a year earlier); Social Security’s covered-worker ratio has fallen from 5.1 in 1960 to 2.7 in 2024, heading to 2.3 by 2035, with OASI reserves projected depleted Q4 2032 per the government’s own actuary; and the grid buildout needs $1.3-1.4 trillion in planned utility capex between 2026 and 2030.
• The CPI fork — what robots can and can’t make: Indexed to 2000, machine-made goods have collapsed (computers to roughly 7 cents on the dollar) while tuition, school fees, childcare, and medical services are up 125% and outrunning the average, bottlenecked on land, zoning, and licensing; the official CPI can be “perfectly accurate and completely useless” because the basket isn’t your basket — which is why new Fed chair Kevin Warsh calls a supply-response price rise non-inflationary (i.e., no tightening) even as three FOMC members dissented for a hike and the 30-year jumped 11 points on the hold.
• The scarcity ladder and why equities aren’t the answer: Rank assets by how easily more can be created — fiat (unlimited), stocks (dilutable), gold (~1.7% stock-to-flow, 6-7 year supply response), housing (robots can build houses but not land), and Bitcoin (fixed, no issuer); owning the companies building the abundance is a levered execution bet, not a claim on abundance itself, as Musk’s own net worth peaking at $1.45 trillion on June 16 and shedding roughly $750 billion in six weeks demonstrates.