Candace Owens Reveals Charlie Kirk Safety Head’s ZERO Plan for Subsequent Tour Cease
Candace Owens has revealed a “glaring oddity” in the security protocols surrounding Charlie Kirk, specifically concerning the event scheduled immediately after his death.
Brian Harpole, head of Charlie Kirk’s security, had previously detailed extensive advance planning for events, including permitting, questionnaires, and coordination with local authorities. The complete absence of any security plan for the September 11th event at Therese Bible College, the very next stop on Kirk’s tour, directly contradicts Harpole’s claims and raises profound suspicions about foreknowledge of Kirk’s fate.
This article will examine Harpole’s stated security procedures, contrast them with the lack of planning for the September 11th event, and explore the unsettling implications of this discrepancy.
🚨 BOMBSHELL Charlie Kirk’s Security Team Had ZERO Plan for the NEXT TOUR STOP – As If They KNEW He Wouldn’t Make It! 😱
Candace just dropped a massive red flag on tonight’s episode: Someone leaked to her that Charlie’s security team (led by Brian Harpole) NEVER bothered to… pic.twitter.com/0n6bXx18kO
— Project Constitution (@ProjectConstitu) January 8, 2026
Brian Harpole’s Stated Security Protocols
Brian Harpole publicly boasted about a meticulous, multi-stage security planning process that typically began weeks in advance for Charlie Kirk’s events. On the Shawn Ryan show, Harpole stated: “We generally, the permitting process and all that goes on behind the scenes.” He detailed a system involving questionnaires, “busy work” days in advance, and creating forums to gather information upfront. Harpole described starting “hard conversations, meetings” and intelligence gathering “on the 24th of the month prior” for events, with information shared across a decentralized command app so “every guy that’s on that job can see all the intel that comes in.”
He also mentioned coordinating with entire police departments and discussing elements like drones, indicating a high level of advance engagement with local law enforcement. These detailed accounts establish a clear standard of comprehensive, proactive security planning that was purportedly the norm for Kirk’s engagements.
The September 11th Event: Zero Charlie Kirk Security Plan
In stark contrast to Harpole’s claims, the event scheduled for September 11th at Therese Bible College in Woodland Park, Colorado, had absolutely no security plan in place. Candace Owens received a tip from someone directly involved with the event’s planning, revealing that after Kirk’s assassination, a “panicked meeting” took place.
This meeting, headed by the chief of police, was to transform the event into a vigil, and attendees were shocked to discover: “they had absolutely no security plan in place.” Owens questioned directly: “Why didn’t Dan Flood and Brian Harpole and Turning Point USA’s security have any coordination with the police departments up in Colorado?” The complete absence of planning for a high-profile event, especially one immediately following another tour stop, stands as a direct contradiction to Harpole’s described standard operating procedures.
The Discrepancy: A Suspicious Omission
The glaring inconsistency between Harpole’s detailed security claims and the total lack of preparation for the September 11th event constitutes a massive red flag, suggesting a deeply suspicious omission. Owens characterized this as “another glaring oddity in this security protocol,” implying a pattern of irregularities. This raises the question: if standard procedure required weeks of advance planning and coordination, why did they completely overlook this particular event, especially given its proximity to a previous engagement?
The lack of “busy work,” permitting, questionnaires, or police coordination for an event of this nature is unprecedented according to Harpole’s own statements. This omission is not merely sloppy; it strongly implies that the security team, or elements within it, may have had foreknowledge that Charlie Kirk would not make it to the September 11th event.
Conclusion: Unsettling Questions and the Search for Truth
The stark contrast between Brian Harpole’s detailed security protocols and the complete absence of planning for Charlie Kirk’s September 11th event demands immediate answers. This “glaring oddity” suggests a potential cover-up or, at minimum, a gross negligence that directly implicates those responsible for Kirk’s safety. The public deserves a full and transparent explanation for why a standard security protocol was abandoned for a critical event, especially when the question looms: did they already know Charlie wouldn’t be there?