Are Ultrasounds of Unborn Infants Making Individuals Extra Professional-Life?
How much does an ultrasound impact a woman’s decision whether to abort? How much does it affect the societal attitude toward the destruction of unborn children?
If you are a member of the Abortion Industrial Complex, you’ll announce proudly “none.” Not that Abortion Industry is big into truth anyway, in fact ultrasounds make a huge difference, as anyone who has ever worked at pregnancy help center will testify.
The New York Post’s Rikki Schlott once wrote, “Today, ultrasounds are more advanced than ever. Gone is the era of the traditional, black and white, grainy 2D images. Now, through 3D, 4D, and HD ultrasounds — which were developed and entered commercial use in the 1990s — women are able to access clear, photo-quality images of fetuses and even video footage of the fetus’ movement. ”
Follow LifeNews.com on Instagram for pro-life pictures and videos.
In particular I remember glooming on to the work of GOP pollster Wes Anderson whom Schlott talked to in depth
We learn from “How next-gen ultrasounds are changing the abortion debate” that Anderson had “conducted more than a dozen intense focus groups with American voters about abortion.”
“Indeed, this generation of young women grew up seeing ultrasounds taped to the refrigerators or posted on the Instagram pages of proud expecting mothers,” according to Schlott. “Now that they’re seeing 3D and 4D imaging, it’s no wonder the argument that a fetus is ‘just a clump of cells’ seems to be losing its credibility.”
Anderson says, “he’s noticed a discernible shift in the conversations about the issue, thanks to improvements in ultrasound technology.”
Anderson, who has worked as a pollster for decades, said, “The conversation has changed because of the advancement of medical imagery more than anything else.” He told Schlott, “It sounds overly simplified, but it’s not. Ultrasounds are actually the driver.”
What did the focus groups bring up again and again? “The ultrasounds — and the refinement of ultrasounds and 3D ultrasounds—and they just said, ‘Well, that’s a baby,’” Anderson explained.
“The science of imaging has moved to a point where your average voter now says, ‘I’m not going to argue over whether that’s a baby. I know it’s a baby. Now, let’s talk about how we balance all this out, and balance that with the rights of the mother.’”
And it’s the younger women in the focus groups–18-29– who were most intrigued by advancements in ultrasound technology.
They tend to cite ultrasounds as a reason to question the ethics of abortion.
Danielle Pitzer is content producer for Focus on the Family. She told Schlott, “When a woman has an unexpected pregnancy, there can be a lot of fear… [but] an ultrasound cuts through the noise, the fear, the ‘what ifs’ and helps a woman see the life inside her.” She added, “Ultrasounds make the pregnancy real.”
Needless to say, pro-abortion individuals and organizations fiercely oppose informed consent legislation, which often requires that abortion-minded women be given the opportunity to see their unborn child.
For example, the pro-abortion to the gills American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG] call them (at best) “ill-advised” while the fiercely opposed Guttmacher Institute describes ultrasounds as “a veiled attempt to personify the fetus and dissuade an individual from obtaining abortion.”
“Personifying the fetus?”
Does that mean treating unborn children with minimal respect?
Or giving women a chance to breathe before she goes through with a life-and-death decision?
Or actually accepting the principle of informed consent?
I guess not.
LifeNews.com Note: Dave Andrusko is the editor of National Right to Life News and an author and editor of several books on abortion topics. He frequently writes Today’s News and Views — an online opinion column on pro-life issues.
