Screenshot 2025 07 28 at 8.37.28pm 1200x630.png
Real Analysis

President Trump’s Lawyer David Schoen Says Obama Could Still Be Impeached, and Stripped of his IMMUNITY | JP

0


President Trump’s lawyer David Schoen has just told Newsmax that a path exists for President Barack Hussein Obama to be stripped of his Presidential Immunity.

Watch here:

FULL TRANSCRIPT:

President Trump is right when he said the immunity decision would help President Obama.

But you know what it doesn’t help him with? Impeachment.

According to the Democratic Party and the House managers in the second impeachment trial, a former president, once out of office, is still subject to impeachment.

In other words, they’ve argued Lincoln could be impeached, George Washington impeached, and certainly, as I predicted at the time, this would come back — they would rue the day — because President Obama could be impeached if this evidence really says what it says.

And that it could also strip him of the immunity because under Article 1, Section 3, Clause 7 of the Constitution, the Democrats argued it bars one from holding further office and the language itself says you’re still subject to criminal prosecution or indictment.

So we’ll see how that plays out.

Backup here if needed:

With all due respect to Attorney Schoen, I would posit to you that none of these actions are even remotely covered by Presidential Immunity in the first place:

UPDATE: President Obama Does NOT Have Immunity For RussiaGate — TWO Reasons!

Yesterday, I brought you this report completely debunking the idea that Barack Hussein Obama could claim Presidential Immunity for his treasonous coup against President Trump.

In case you missed it:

No — Of Course Barack Obama Does NOT Have “Presidential Immunity” For RussiaGate

In that report, I focused on the fact that Obama cannot legally claim Presidential Immunity for anything outside the scope of “Official Acts” of the Presidency.

And certainly spying on a campaign, fabricating evidence, weaponizing the DOJ, and everything else he did is FAR outside the scope of “Official Acts”.

So any immunity claim fails on those grounds.

And I think that’s the clearest and easiest way to strike down ANY claim of Presidential Immunity surrounding RussiaGate/ObamaGate.

But now Mike Davis adds a second angle that is also strong.

Davis points out you don’t get immunity for anything done after you leave office, which means anything from January 2017 until now is completely unprotected by immunity:

🚨BREAKING: Mike Davis explains that Obama does NOT have Presidential Immunity on Russia hoax.

Says all co-conspirators remain within the statute of limitations and can be charged under an ongoing criminal conspiracy.

Davis then goes scorched earth saying everyone involved should be terrified and that justice is coming:

“Presidential immunity covers his actions while he’s president, not when he’s the former president. When he’s participating in the coverup of this conspiracy, he doesn’t have presidential immunity.”

“They say we are well beyond the statute of limitations, you’re not. This is an ongoing criminal conspiracy. In order for the conspiracy to stop, you have to disavow it.”

“They are still covering up the conspiracy and perjuring themselves. We saw perjury by high ranking Obama officials. We are well within the statutes of limitations.”

“To these democrats, justice is coming. I’d be very scared. The Bureau of prisons will have plenty of space.”

So if anyone (including President Trump) tells you Obama will just claim Presidential Immunity, kindly show them this article.

For more on why I think President Trump said that, read this:

No — Of Course Barack Obama Does NOT Have “Presidential Immunity” For RussiaGate

There has been a lot swirling around online today about how even if Barack Obama did do everything Tulsi Gabbard has exposed, it won’t matter because he has “Presidential Immunity”.

Like this:

And this:

To be fair, President Trump himself said Obama likely has immunity as you can see in the clip above, so everyone parroting that is simply parroting President Trump.

But it’s a good thing you have me to set this all straight.

SHORT ANSWER: that’s complete nonsense!

And I’ll tell you why…

Yes, it’s true that the Supreme Court did grant President Trump wide-ranging Presidential Immunity in that landmark Supreme Court case last year, but that is not a blank check to do whatever you want.

Even though that Supreme Court ruling was very broad based, it still has boundaries, and those boundaries are that it only applies to “Official Acts” of the office.

In other words, you can’t shoot someone while you’re President and claim Presidential Immunity, it doesn’t work like that.

So why would President Trump say it?

Because he’s the absolute master at misdirection!

He gets you complacent when you should be very worried, and he agitates you when you should be complacent.

It’s classic Sun Tzu “Art of War” 101.

And that’s exactly what I think he’s doing here, classic misdirection to Obama and to the MSM, meanwhile he’s about to spring the trap!

It’s basic Constitutional Law that you don’t get immunity outside of “Official Acts” and spying on your opponent’s campaign, weaponizing the DOJ to fabricate evidence that goes directly against the real intelligence that had, and trying to frame your political opponent for something you know they did not do is so far from “Official Acts” it’s laughable.

And no, we don’t have to prove Obama’s actions meet the definition of “Treason” in order for Presidential Immunity to apply.  Those are two separate issues and entirely mutually independent of each other.

Whether he committed Treason (or a myriad of other crimes) is one issue.

Whether he can claim Presidential Immunity is an entirely separate different issue.

I always like to Fact-Check my own work, so I went to ChatGPT and ran all of this through the AI, and the AI confirmed EXACTLY what I just told you:

✅ What Did the Supreme Court Say About Presidential Immunity?

  • The Court said a President has broad immunity for “official acts” done while in office.

  • An official act means something the President is allowed to do as part of their job—like signing bills, appointing judges, or giving military orders.

  • The Court also said a President does NOT have immunity for unofficial or private acts—things outside their job.

❌ Can a President Claim Immunity for Crimes Like Murder?

No.
If a President shot someone in the street, that’s not part of their job.
That’s a crime, not an official duty. Immunity doesn’t cover that.

So the short answer: Presidential Immunity only applies to official acts, not personal crimes or things outside the job.

⚖ How Do Courts Decide What’s “Official”?

  • They look at the nature of the act, not the President’s motive.

  • If the act is something only the President can do under the Constitution or law, it might be considered “official.”

  • But if the act is just political dirty tricks, campaign work, or personal gain, that’s not official.

🧠 Your Hypothetical: President Spies, Frames a Rival, Orders DOJ to Fake Reports

  • Spying on a rival’s campaign and creating fake evidence is not a lawful duty of the President.

  • The President cannot order DOJ to break the law or make up reports. That’s abusing power for personal or political reasons.

  • Even if it doesn’t count as “treason,” it’s still illegal and outside legitimate presidential duties.

Could the President claim immunity?

  • They might try, arguing “I was directing the DOJ—part of my job.”

  • But the courts would likely say: You crossed the line. Making DOJ do fake investigations is not an official function. It’s a crime and an abuse of power.

  • Therefore, immunity would not apply.

✅ Bottom Line

  • Official acts = broad protection.

  • Personal crimes, political sabotage, or corrupt acts = no immunity.

  • In your scenario, the President almost certainly would not be immune, because the actions are criminal and outside the lawful duties of the office.





Source
Las Vegas News Magazine

Continue Reading
You might also like More from author
Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More